to return to
A Really Rotten Borough
CLICK HERE
latest update 12 February 2010
............................................................

Friday 12 March 2010

Letter to Angela Eagle, MP, et al....

The following letter had been made available to this website:


From: The Loose Cannon
To: eaglea@parliament.uk
Cc: phso.enquiries@ombudsman.org.uk ; chrisjohnson@mercurypress.co.uk ; fieldf@parliament.uk ; hesfords@parliament.uk ; coopery@parliament.uk ; SHAWJ@parliament.uk ; camerond@parliament.uk ; cleggn@parliament.uk ; browng@parliament.uk ; Justin Dunn
Sent: Friday, March 12, 2010 10:16 AM
Subject: Copy Letter to DLA re DWP appointeeship

Dear Ms Eagle,

The following is a copy of a letter that has today been sent to the Disability Living Allowance in Blackpool.

As this affects your constituents as well as your Governmental department I'm sure you will wish to take this matter up at the highest level in order to prevent the further abuse of people with learning disabilities.

Sincerely,m
(signed)




Customer Services Manager
Warbreck House
Warbreck Hill Road
Blackpool FY2 0ZG
12 March 2010

Dear Sir/Madam,

Serious concerns about Appointees

I understand that recently Chris Winstanley, acting on behalf of Wirral Borough Council, applied for, and was granted, Appointeeship in respect of several adults with learning disabilities who reside at Bermuda Road, Curlew Way and Edgerhill Road, Moreton, Wirral.

I note that amongst the declarations made on the application form Ms Winstanley will have stated that she has discussed her appointment with other family members or next of kin and that they do not object to her appointment.

This is totally false. Family members and next of kin were NOT consulted prior to this action being taken and at least some of them most certainly DO object to her appointment. In fact, at least one of them wanted to apply to be an Appointee, but was told by the Council that they held Power of Attorney for her relative.

Background
Seventeen adults with severe learning disabilities living at the above three properties were systematically abused financially by Wirral Council’s Department of Adult Social Services between 1997 and 2006, amounting to £500,000. Six have died, and four have moved out, leaving seven in residence.

Thanks only to the persistence of a Departmental whistleblower the Council has very reluctantly been forced to pay back some of the money that was taken unlawfully by them. However, it has consistently tried to cover up its actions, and minimise the reimbursements.

Most of the tenants do not have capacity; they cannot read or write and some are blind. Nevertheless the Department ignored the elected members’ instructions that advocates be appointed to explain everything to the tenants and next of kin and assist them to make their claims for reimbursement. Instead they simply sent letters directly to the tenants, telling them there had been ‘a mistake’ and if they wanted to claim reimbursement they should sign the form and return it in the attached envelope. However the following paragraph told them that IF they claimed the money to which they were entitled, it would affect their Benefits!

In granting the Department of Adult Social Services and Wirral Council Appointeeship over these tenants the Department of Work and Pensions has unwittingly handed the abusers total control of the tenants and their finances, effectively silencing the concerns of their relatives and next-of-kin.

I trust you will agree that because of the background to this case Wirral Council, and in particular the Department of Adult Social Services, are unfit to hold these Appointeeships. If next-of-kin are unwilling or unable to act as Appointees then they should be permitted to appoint a suitable alternative, such as a solicitor or vicar in their place in order to safeguard their relatives.

I would be grateful if you would investigate this thoroughly in order to protect the claimants. .

Reproduced by kind permission of The Loose Cannon

Thursday 11 March 2010

Appointeeships granted to Wirral Borough Council

The following Freedom of Information request has been made by Veridici

Can you please tell me

1. Has Wirral Borough Council, or any individual representing Wirral Borough Council, applied for Appointeeships in respect of residents of Bermuda Road, Curlew Way and Edgehill Road, Moreton, Wirral within the last twelve months.

2, How many individuals did the application cover?

3. Were any individuals at other addresses within Wirral included in the application?

4. Was the application successful, and the Appointeeship granted?

5. If the answer to 4 is in the affirmative, on what date was the Appointeeship granted?

6. Did the individual signing the application form declare that relatives of the individuals had been consulted about the application?

7. What are the penalties for making a false declaration?

Thank you
.

© copyright Veridici.
.

Claims for reimbursement

A response to this FOI request has been posted at http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/. Wirral Council's answers are in bold.

1. As of today's date, how many current tenants of Bermuda Road,Curlew Way, or Edgehill Road have personally submitted claims for reimbursement in accordance with Cabinet resolution 256 (3)&(5) of 14 January 2010?

One current resident has submitted a claim for reimbursement.

2. As of today's date, how many Appointees have submitted claims for reimbursement in accordance with Cabinet resolution 256 (3)&(5) of 14 January 2010, on behalf of tenants, former tenants, or deceased tenants of the above properties, together with names and job title of the Appointee if they are a Council employee?

One claim has been received from an Appointee.

3. As of today's date, how many Attorneys have submitted claims for reimbursement on behalf of tenants or former tenants of the above properties, in accordance with Cabinet resolution 256 (3)&(5) of 14 January 2010?

No claims have been received from Attorneys.

4. As of today's date, how many next of kin have submitted claims for reimbursement in accordance with Cabinet resolution 256 (3)&(5) of 14 January 2010, on behalf of former or deceased tenants of the above properties?

No claims have been received from next of kin.

5. How many next of kin have been contacted in accordance with Cabinet resolution 256 (4)?

There is no reference to next of kin in Cabinet resolution 256(4).
Veridici has asked the following supplementary questions:

1. How many carers and advocates of the seventeen original tenants and former tenants are their next-of-kin and/or relative?

2. How many relatives and/or next-of-kin of the tenants have the Council initiated contact with regarding the reimbursement?

3. On what date did the tenants and former tenants receive reimbursement letters from the Council?

4. On what date/s did the Council contact the relatives and/or next-of-kin of the tenants and former tenants about the reimbursement?

5. If the answer to the latter question is that the Council has not done so, why not?

6. On what date did the Council apply to the DWP to request a corporate Appointeeship over the affairs of the tenants?

7. How many tenants does that Appointeeship cover?

.

© copyright Veridici & Wirral Borough Council. Reproduced under fair use for the dual purposes of comment and news reporting
.